<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A watershed moment for China: Islam or Christianity?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 11:04:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ziahshah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-1562</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ziahshah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:54:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-1562</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dear Atta

This post is Muslim versus Christian debate.  Please have the wisdom to take comments about internal struggles among Muslims, to posts on those issues.  Try some of the posts in the Muslim Times please.

Best Regards!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Atta</p>
<p>This post is Muslim versus Christian debate.  Please have the wisdom to take comments about internal struggles among Muslims, to posts on those issues.  Try some of the posts in the Muslim Times please.</p>
<p>Best Regards!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atta</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[atta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 23:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-1561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[only mouhammad is the prpohet of allah not ahmmad merza beacuse quran is  our evident on it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>only mouhammad is the prpohet of allah not ahmmad merza beacuse quran is  our evident on it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muhammad Zafrullah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Muhammad Zafrullah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 05:39:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please change: &quot;the fact that the founders of all religions, Confucius, Buddha, Tao, Krishna, Ram, Moses and Jesus were prophets of God.&quot; to 
&quot;the fact that the founders of all other religions, Confucius, Buddha, Tao, Krishna, Ram, Moses and Jesus were prophets of God.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please change: &#8220;the fact that the founders of all religions, Confucius, Buddha, Tao, Krishna, Ram, Moses and Jesus were prophets of God.&#8221; to<br />
&#8220;the fact that the founders of all other religions, Confucius, Buddha, Tao, Krishna, Ram, Moses and Jesus were prophets of God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zia H. Shah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-491</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zia H. Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Ebionites and the Jews&lt;/strong&gt;

One of the confusions often created by Christian apologists is as to what is the Orthodox view in Christianity, Unitarian or Trinitarian? The simple answer is that the Jews are strict monotheists and so were the early Christians. They were circumcised according to the Jewish tradition. It was a political move of St Paul to give up circumcision to recruit the gentiles. There are so many proofs for the open minded Christians to see that Unitarian Monotheism was the Jewish position and also position of Jesus Christ and the early Christians. The Exhibit that I want to present in this comment are the &#039;Ebionites.&#039; Each of my comments here is a separate evidence against the dogmas of Christianity especially &#039;Trinity.&#039;

Encyclopedia Britannica says about Ebionites, a group of early Christians, as it explains that they did not consider Jesus to be God but a Prophet:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Ebionites are member of an early ascetic sect of Jewish Christians. The Ebionites were one of several such sects that originated in and around Palestine in the first centuries ad and included the Nazarenes and Elkasites. The name of the sect is from the Hebrew ebyonim, or ebionim (&#039;the poor&#039;); it was not founded, as later Christian writers stated, by a certain Ebion.

Little information exists on the Ebionites, and the surviving accounts are subject to considerable debate, since they are uniformly derived from the Ebionites’ opponents. The first mention of the sect is in the works of the Christian theologian St. Irenaeus, notably in his Adversus haereses (Against Heresies; c. 180); other sources include the writings of Origen and St. Epiphanius of Constantia. The Ebionite movement may have arisen about the time of the destruction of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem (ad 70). Its members evidently left Palestine to avoid persecution and settled in Transjordan (notably at Pella) and Syria and were later known to be in Asia Minor and Egypt. The sect seems to have existed into the 4th century.

Most of the features of Ebionite doctrine were anticipated in the teachings of the earlier Qumrān sect, as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. They believed in one God and taught that Jesus was the Messiah and was the true “prophet” mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:15. They rejected the Virgin Birth of Jesus, instead holding that he was the natural son of Joseph and Mary. The Ebionites believed Jesus became the Messiah because he obeyed the Jewish Law. They themselves faithfully followed the Law, although they removed what they regarded as interpolations in order to uphold their teachings.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&quot;Ebionite.&quot; Encyclopædia Britannica. 2010. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 06 Jan. 2010 .]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Ebionites and the Jews</strong></p>
<p>One of the confusions often created by Christian apologists is as to what is the Orthodox view in Christianity, Unitarian or Trinitarian? The simple answer is that the Jews are strict monotheists and so were the early Christians. They were circumcised according to the Jewish tradition. It was a political move of St Paul to give up circumcision to recruit the gentiles. There are so many proofs for the open minded Christians to see that Unitarian Monotheism was the Jewish position and also position of Jesus Christ and the early Christians. The Exhibit that I want to present in this comment are the &#8216;Ebionites.&#8217; Each of my comments here is a separate evidence against the dogmas of Christianity especially &#8216;Trinity.&#8217;</p>
<p>Encyclopedia Britannica says about Ebionites, a group of early Christians, as it explains that they did not consider Jesus to be God but a Prophet:</p>
<blockquote><p>Ebionites are member of an early ascetic sect of Jewish Christians. The Ebionites were one of several such sects that originated in and around Palestine in the first centuries ad and included the Nazarenes and Elkasites. The name of the sect is from the Hebrew ebyonim, or ebionim (&#8216;the poor&#8217;); it was not founded, as later Christian writers stated, by a certain Ebion.</p>
<p>Little information exists on the Ebionites, and the surviving accounts are subject to considerable debate, since they are uniformly derived from the Ebionites’ opponents. The first mention of the sect is in the works of the Christian theologian St. Irenaeus, notably in his Adversus haereses (Against Heresies; c. 180); other sources include the writings of Origen and St. Epiphanius of Constantia. The Ebionite movement may have arisen about the time of the destruction of the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem (ad 70). Its members evidently left Palestine to avoid persecution and settled in Transjordan (notably at Pella) and Syria and were later known to be in Asia Minor and Egypt. The sect seems to have existed into the 4th century.</p>
<p>Most of the features of Ebionite doctrine were anticipated in the teachings of the earlier Qumrān sect, as revealed in the Dead Sea Scrolls. They believed in one God and taught that Jesus was the Messiah and was the true “prophet” mentioned in Deuteronomy 18:15. They rejected the Virgin Birth of Jesus, instead holding that he was the natural son of Joseph and Mary. The Ebionites believed Jesus became the Messiah because he obeyed the Jewish Law. They themselves faithfully followed the Law, although they removed what they regarded as interpolations in order to uphold their teachings.</p></blockquote>
<p>&#8220;Ebionite.&#8221; Encyclopædia Britannica. 2010. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 06 Jan. 2010 .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zia H. Shah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-490</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zia H. Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 22:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;If Jesus Christ died for three days he could not be eternal, at least not any longer&lt;/strong&gt;
The three persons in Trinity, God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost are allegedly co-eternal and co-equal according to the official Christian belief.  But, Trinity has only one claim to fame, it is Paradox Par Excellence. From whatever angle you examine it, it yields new proofs against itself.

First of all the term &#039;begotten,&#039; suggests that Jesus the Son was not eternal with God the Father. Secondly, when he died for three days after crucifixion, he lost any claim to eternity. In other words, Jesus is not eternal at all, he is not of the same substance as the Eternal God the Father.

Time to move on from Trinitarianism, not to atheism but to genuine Unitarianism!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>If Jesus Christ died for three days he could not be eternal, at least not any longer</strong><br />
The three persons in Trinity, God the Father, Jesus Christ and the Holy Ghost are allegedly co-eternal and co-equal according to the official Christian belief.  But, Trinity has only one claim to fame, it is Paradox Par Excellence. From whatever angle you examine it, it yields new proofs against itself.</p>
<p>First of all the term &#8216;begotten,&#8217; suggests that Jesus the Son was not eternal with God the Father. Secondly, when he died for three days after crucifixion, he lost any claim to eternity. In other words, Jesus is not eternal at all, he is not of the same substance as the Eternal God the Father.</p>
<p>Time to move on from Trinitarianism, not to atheism but to genuine Unitarianism!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zia H. Shah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-489</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zia H. Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:45:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-489</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Christianity: Should it evolve into Islam? &lt;/strong&gt;

Every Christian and Muslim, who is knowledgeable about commentary or exegesis of the scriptures, knows that verses cannot be interpreted in isolation and are understood in the context of their neighboring verses and ultimately in the context of the whole of the scripture. This poses a very special problem for the Bible, if all of it is not literal or even inspired word of God then how can you interpret some genuine verses in light of forgeries and hotch-potch out there? Does the presence of forgeries in the Bible make the whole field of exegesis hocus-pocus? How can you understand word of God in light of fiction and make belief without making the whole affair a joke?

To see my collection of more than 100 articles about Christianity, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/11/religion/christianity/christianity-should-it-evolve-into-islam-3&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;click here.&lt;/a&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Christianity: Should it evolve into Islam? </strong></p>
<p>Every Christian and Muslim, who is knowledgeable about commentary or exegesis of the scriptures, knows that verses cannot be interpreted in isolation and are understood in the context of their neighboring verses and ultimately in the context of the whole of the scripture. This poses a very special problem for the Bible, if all of it is not literal or even inspired word of God then how can you interpret some genuine verses in light of forgeries and hotch-potch out there? Does the presence of forgeries in the Bible make the whole field of exegesis hocus-pocus? How can you understand word of God in light of fiction and make belief without making the whole affair a joke?</p>
<p>To see my collection of more than 100 articles about Christianity, <a href="http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/11/religion/christianity/christianity-should-it-evolve-into-islam-3" rel="nofollow">click here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zia H. Shah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zia H. Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 18:05:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Recruiting the four Horsemen of Neo-atheism into Cavalry of Islam &lt;/strong&gt;
First a few words about the big picture. Atheists are right in exposing the irrationality of the Christian dogma. However, the Christians are right in as far as their claim that there needs to be a Creator of this universe, Who employed natural means to do His work. However, both parties in their self-conceit are not listening to how Islam resolves their conflict; Islam as understood by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community.

Christopher Hitchens, Prof. Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Prof. Richard Dawkins have been called the four horsemen of neo-atheism. That is old news. The latest is that I have just recruited them as volunteers for army of Islam; they form my meager cavalry, which will establish the philosophical superiority of Islam over Christianity. They will work hard for every day of their God given life, for the cause of Islam, without any worldly compensation from me.

Every time they make a good case for evolution, for common lineage of all life forms on planet earth, they establish the truth of Islam as opposed to the dogma of Christianity. In my previous writings I have shown, how evolution, by showing that Adam and Eve were not the first human couple, strikes a death blow to the dogma of Original Sin. I appreciate the clarity of thinking of my cavalry, except in the areas of their blind spots, where they are blinded by their ideology, so I will continue to use their scholarship suitably. With this army of only four, I will fight in all directions, East, West, North and South, by the Grace of Allah.  We will fight not with swords or arrows, not even with pen, just one mouse and a key board, which I bought for twenty dollars of my hard earned money!  My mouse and key board will just properly direct their words.  To make sure that my horsemen do not double cross me and start fighting their own battles, I will need to suitably expose their blind spots of understanding also, so they submit to the will of Allah and continue to serve Islam.  Read on, and in the words of Sir Francis Bacon’s advice, “Read not to contradict … but to weigh and consider.”

It is not politically correct to condemn Deism, after all it was the religion of the Founding Fathers of USA and of the celebrated Albert Einstein.  In God Delusion, one of my horsemen, Prof. Richard Dawkins applauds the religion of Einstein and in a debate with John Lennox, says that a plausible case could be made for a Deist’s God.  But, when it comes to Theism, Christianity and Islam, my horsemen use a broad brush and condemn both equally, without realizing that Islam is much closer to Deism than Christianity.

www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/recruiting-the-four-horsemen-of-neo-atheism-into-cavalry-of-islam]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Recruiting the four Horsemen of Neo-atheism into Cavalry of Islam </strong><br />
First a few words about the big picture. Atheists are right in exposing the irrationality of the Christian dogma. However, the Christians are right in as far as their claim that there needs to be a Creator of this universe, Who employed natural means to do His work. However, both parties in their self-conceit are not listening to how Islam resolves their conflict; Islam as understood by the Ahmadiyya Muslim Community.</p>
<p>Christopher Hitchens, Prof. Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris and Prof. Richard Dawkins have been called the four horsemen of neo-atheism. That is old news. The latest is that I have just recruited them as volunteers for army of Islam; they form my meager cavalry, which will establish the philosophical superiority of Islam over Christianity. They will work hard for every day of their God given life, for the cause of Islam, without any worldly compensation from me.</p>
<p>Every time they make a good case for evolution, for common lineage of all life forms on planet earth, they establish the truth of Islam as opposed to the dogma of Christianity. In my previous writings I have shown, how evolution, by showing that Adam and Eve were not the first human couple, strikes a death blow to the dogma of Original Sin. I appreciate the clarity of thinking of my cavalry, except in the areas of their blind spots, where they are blinded by their ideology, so I will continue to use their scholarship suitably. With this army of only four, I will fight in all directions, East, West, North and South, by the Grace of Allah.  We will fight not with swords or arrows, not even with pen, just one mouse and a key board, which I bought for twenty dollars of my hard earned money!  My mouse and key board will just properly direct their words.  To make sure that my horsemen do not double cross me and start fighting their own battles, I will need to suitably expose their blind spots of understanding also, so they submit to the will of Allah and continue to serve Islam.  Read on, and in the words of Sir Francis Bacon’s advice, “Read not to contradict … but to weigh and consider.”</p>
<p>It is not politically correct to condemn Deism, after all it was the religion of the Founding Fathers of USA and of the celebrated Albert Einstein.  In God Delusion, one of my horsemen, Prof. Richard Dawkins applauds the religion of Einstein and in a debate with John Lennox, says that a plausible case could be made for a Deist’s God.  But, when it comes to Theism, Christianity and Islam, my horsemen use a broad brush and condemn both equally, without realizing that Islam is much closer to Deism than Christianity.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/recruiting-the-four-horsemen-of-neo-atheism-into-cavalry-of-islam" rel="nofollow">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/recruiting-the-four-horsemen-of-neo-atheism-into-cavalry-of-islam</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zia H. Shah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-487</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zia H. Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 16:26:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-487</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Islam and Muslims do not equal terrorism&lt;/strong&gt;

We have scores of articles here to illustrate that there are some Muslim Terrorists, just like there have been and are Christian and Jewish terrorists, but Islam and Muslims do not equal terrorism.

Keep reading the Muslim Times and find for yourself.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Islam and Muslims do not equal terrorism</strong></p>
<p>We have scores of articles here to illustrate that there are some Muslim Terrorists, just like there have been and are Christian and Jewish terrorists, but Islam and Muslims do not equal terrorism.</p>
<p>Keep reading the Muslim Times and find for yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zia H. Shah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-486</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zia H. Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 15:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-486</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;King David glorifying God the Creator, without knowing an iota about Jesus&lt;/strong&gt;

King David was a Jewish prophet 7-8 centuries before Jesus and has plenty of coverage in the Old Testament in the Bible.  In the Psalms we can read time and again, how the King or the Prophet David glorifies, God the Creator or God the Father, without knowing anything about Jesus, as he preceded him by centuries. David prays:

LORD, our Lord,
how majestic is your name in all the earth!
You have set your glory
in the heavens.
Through the praise of children and infants
you have established a stronghold against your enemies,
to silence the foe and the avenger.
When I consider your heavens,
the work of your fingers,
the moon and the stars,
which you have set in place,
What is mankind that you are mindful of them,
human beings that you care for them?

(Psalm 8:1-4, New International Version)

So, what I want to suggest for my Christian readers is that to know God, we do not need to necessarily know about Jesus Christ and he forms no part of Divinity, as we can see His Majesty in the prayers of David, without any reference to Jesus!  The Christians either have to claim that David did not know what he is talking about and take the wrath of 15 million Jews or accept that Jesus forms no part of divinity!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>King David glorifying God the Creator, without knowing an iota about Jesus</strong></p>
<p>King David was a Jewish prophet 7-8 centuries before Jesus and has plenty of coverage in the Old Testament in the Bible.  In the Psalms we can read time and again, how the King or the Prophet David glorifies, God the Creator or God the Father, without knowing anything about Jesus, as he preceded him by centuries. David prays:</p>
<p>LORD, our Lord,<br />
how majestic is your name in all the earth!<br />
You have set your glory<br />
in the heavens.<br />
Through the praise of children and infants<br />
you have established a stronghold against your enemies,<br />
to silence the foe and the avenger.<br />
When I consider your heavens,<br />
the work of your fingers,<br />
the moon and the stars,<br />
which you have set in place,<br />
What is mankind that you are mindful of them,<br />
human beings that you care for them?</p>
<p>(Psalm 8:1-4, New International Version)</p>
<p>So, what I want to suggest for my Christian readers is that to know God, we do not need to necessarily know about Jesus Christ and he forms no part of Divinity, as we can see His Majesty in the prayers of David, without any reference to Jesus!  The Christians either have to claim that David did not know what he is talking about and take the wrath of 15 million Jews or accept that Jesus forms no part of divinity!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zia H. Shah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-485</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zia H. Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 14:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Two natures of Jesus: another Christian mystery &lt;/strong&gt;
If one tries to genuinely understand or conceptualize the dual or hybrid nature of Jesus rationally, one is likely to be led to truth, away from Trinitarian faith to Unitarianism, be it Christianity, Judaism or Islam. Jesus is a man and God the father is divine.
In logical terms Jesus cannot be man and God at the same time. Like a man cannot be a rock or an apple, at the same time; men, rocks and apples are different things!
Humans and God are different things, but the paradoxical Christian affirmation is called a mystery because you cannot logically explain how Jesus can be both things at once. This is why the rational and insightful Christian theologians label the Christian dogma as mysteries for you cannot logically understand them. Either you adamantly stick to them in the name of faith or you trade them for some other better theology!
Historically, the debate about dual nature of Jesus can be examined in the first few Ecumenical councils and in the sixteenth century in the debate between Martin Luther and Calvin. it is convenient to read some mythical or legendary Jesus, in the prologue of the Gospel of John, but as soon as we start examining the ramifications of divinity of Jesus and the three persons and one being of Trinity, flood gates of contradictions and irrationality open up, that completely wash away any semblance of reasonability in the Christian theology!

www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/christianity/two-natures-of-jesus-another-christian-mystery]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Two natures of Jesus: another Christian mystery </strong><br />
If one tries to genuinely understand or conceptualize the dual or hybrid nature of Jesus rationally, one is likely to be led to truth, away from Trinitarian faith to Unitarianism, be it Christianity, Judaism or Islam. Jesus is a man and God the father is divine.<br />
In logical terms Jesus cannot be man and God at the same time. Like a man cannot be a rock or an apple, at the same time; men, rocks and apples are different things!<br />
Humans and God are different things, but the paradoxical Christian affirmation is called a mystery because you cannot logically explain how Jesus can be both things at once. This is why the rational and insightful Christian theologians label the Christian dogma as mysteries for you cannot logically understand them. Either you adamantly stick to them in the name of faith or you trade them for some other better theology!<br />
Historically, the debate about dual nature of Jesus can be examined in the first few Ecumenical councils and in the sixteenth century in the debate between Martin Luther and Calvin. it is convenient to read some mythical or legendary Jesus, in the prologue of the Gospel of John, but as soon as we start examining the ramifications of divinity of Jesus and the three persons and one being of Trinity, flood gates of contradictions and irrationality open up, that completely wash away any semblance of reasonability in the Christian theology!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/christianity/two-natures-of-jesus-another-christian-mystery" rel="nofollow">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/christianity/two-natures-of-jesus-another-christian-mystery</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zia H. Shah</title>
		<link>http://islamforwest.org/2012/01/02/a-turning-point-for-china-islam-or-christianity/comment-page-1/#comment-484</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zia H. Shah]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2011 13:13:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/?p=29110#comment-484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;strong&gt;Faith and reason: an invitation to the Christians &lt;/strong&gt;

Albert Einstein said, “The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.”

“I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.” Galileo Galilei

Thomas Paine writes in &lt;em&gt;the Age of Reason&lt;/em&gt;, “The most formidable weapon against errors of every kind is reason. I have never used any other, and I trust I never shall.”

To read further:

www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/christianity/faith-and-reason-an-invitation-to-the-christians]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Faith and reason: an invitation to the Christians </strong></p>
<p>Albert Einstein said, “The further the spiritual evolution of mankind advances, the more certain it seems to me that the path to genuine religiosity does not lie through the fear of life, and the fear of death, and blind faith, but through striving after rational knowledge.”</p>
<p>“I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with senses, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use.” Galileo Galilei</p>
<p>Thomas Paine writes in <em>the Age of Reason</em>, “The most formidable weapon against errors of every kind is reason. I have never used any other, and I trust I never shall.”</p>
<p>To read further:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/christianity/faith-and-reason-an-invitation-to-the-christians" rel="nofollow">http://www.themuslimtimes.org/2011/12/religion/christianity/faith-and-reason-an-invitation-to-the-christians</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
